Metainformationen zur Seite
  •  

Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung
de:glossar:replicatio [2023-03-02] – [Zu den Begriffsbildungen] Jens Wittigde:glossar:replicatio [2023-03-16] (aktuell) – [Zu den Begriffsbildungen] Jens Wittig
Zeile 33: Zeile 33:
   * Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a   * Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
   * Camerer, Colin F. et al. (2016): „Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics“, in: Science 351.6280: 1433–1436, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.   * Camerer, Colin F. et al. (2016): „Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics“, in: Science 351.6280: 1433–1436, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.
 +  * Errington, Timothy M. et al. (2021) Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology eLife 10:e71601, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601.
   * Gómez, Omar S. & Juristo, Natalia & Vegas, Sira. (2010). Replication, Reproduction and Re-analysis: Three ways for verifying experimental findings. 1st International Workshop on Replication in Empirical Software Engineering Research (RESER'2010).   * Gómez, Omar S. & Juristo, Natalia & Vegas, Sira. (2010). Replication, Reproduction and Re-analysis: Three ways for verifying experimental findings. 1st International Workshop on Replication in Empirical Software Engineering Research (RESER'2010).
-  * Joachim Hüffmeier, Jens Mazei, Thomas Schultze, Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 66, 2016, Pages 81-92, ISSN 0022-1031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009.+  * Hüffmeier, Joachim & Mazei, Jens & Schultze, Thomas. Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 66, 2016, Pages 81-92, ISSN 0022-1031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009.
   * Open Science Collaboration  (2015), Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science 349.6251, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.   * Open Science Collaboration  (2015), Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science 349.6251, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
   * Schöch, Christof. 2017. “Wiederholende Forschung in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften.” In Konferenzabstracts DHd2017: Digitale Nachhaltigkeit, edited by DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.277113.   * Schöch, Christof. 2017. “Wiederholende Forschung in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften.” In Konferenzabstracts DHd2017: Digitale Nachhaltigkeit, edited by DHd-Verband. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.277113.
-  * Schöch, Christof, van Dalen-Oskam, Karin, Antoniak, Maria, Jannidis, Fotis, & Mimno, David. (2020, June 14). Replication and Computational Literary Studies. Digital Humanities Conference 2020 (DH2020), Ottawa, Canada. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893428. +  * Schöch, Christof & van Dalen-Oskam, Karin & Antoniak, Maria & Jannidis, Fotis & Mimno, David. (2020, June 14). Replication and Computational Literary Studies. Digital Humanities Conference 2020 (DH2020), Ottawa, Canada. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893428.
-  * Errington, Timothy M. et al. (2021) Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology eLife 10:e71601, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601.+
  
 ===== Anforderungen an die Wiederholbarkeit bei textorientierten digitalen Methoden ===== ===== Anforderungen an die Wiederholbarkeit bei textorientierten digitalen Methoden =====